Although we sought trials of any type of mechanically assisted wa

Although we sought trials of any type of mechanically assisted walking training, all of the studies included in this review examined treadmill training. A previous Cochrane systematic review of treadmill training (Moseley et al selleck kinase inhibitor 2005) concluded that it did not have a statistically significant effect on walking speed (three studies) or distance (one study) compared

with any other physiotherapy intervention in people who could already walk after stroke. Neither did treadmill training have a statistically significant effect on walking speed or distance when combined with other task-specific training (three studies). The inclusion of nine studies in the current meta-analysis is probably the main reason that our review came to a different conclusion. This review has both limitations and strengths. A source of bias in the studies included in this review was lack of blinding of therapist and patients, since it is not possible to blind the therapist BMN 673 ic50 or the participants during the delivery of complex interventions. Another source of bias was lack of reporting whether an intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken. The number of

participants per group (mean 21, SD 7.5) was quite low, opening the results to small trial bias. Only four of the nine included studies measured the outcomes after the cessation of intervention, which meant that the maintenance of the effect of intervention could not be evaluated well. through In spite of these shortcomings, the mean PEDro score of 6.7 for the trials included in this review represents high quality. Another strength, unusual in rehabilitation studies, was that the outcome measures were the same, with walking speed always measured using the 10-m Walk Test and walking distance measured using the 6-min Walk Test. Finally, publication bias inherent to systematic reviews was avoided by including studies published in languages other than English. This systematic review provides evidence that treadmill training without body weight support

results in faster walking speed and greater distance than no intervention/ inhibitors non-walking intervention, both immediately after intervention and beyond the intervention period. Clinicians should therefore be confident in prescribing treadmill training for ambulatory stroke individuals when the primary objective of rehabilitation is to improve walking speed and distance, regardless of whether the individuals are at the subacute or chronic stage of their recovery. The parameters of gait training, such as speed, duration, and treadmill inclination, can be tailored to individuals to ensure training is challenging and to provide motivating feedback about the distance walked and the amount of work performed. Footnotes: aThe MIX–Meta-Analysis Made Easy program Version 1.7. http://www.meta-analysis-made-easy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>