6%) based on integration of area is higher compared to that of P25 (19.1%). This demonstrates that the 001 facets for the NFTSs have been enhanced. As known [2, 14, 24], the surface energy and reactivity of the 001 facet are relative

higher than those of other facets in the anatase TiO2. During the process of TiO2 crystal growth, fluorine ions in find more the sol precursor were preferentially adsorbed on the 001 facets, which retarded the growth and facilitated the formation of 001 facets. As shown in the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image (Figure 1e), the crystal faces paralleling to the top and bottom of the nanorods are 001 facets. Therefore, the XRD result displays that more 001 facets are exposed in NFTS sample, which implies better photocatalytic reactivity. The XPS VX-809 in vitro spectra of the NFTS sample are illustrated in Figure 2. The XPS spectra show obvious Nb 3d and F 1s peaks at about 207 and 685 eV, respectively. For the Ti 2p3/2 peak, the binding energy of Ti3+ (457.8 eV) [25] is lower than that of Ti4+ (458.8 eV) [26]. The shape and position of the Ti peaks can be assigned

as a mixture of Ti4+ and Ti3+ states, as shown in Figure 2d. The generation of the Ti3+ states is due to this website the introduction of Nb and F [15, 20]. The existence of Ti3+ centers in TiO2 enhances the photocatalytic activity of the sample [15]. Figure 2 XPS spectra of NFTSs. (a) Survey spectrum, (b) Nb 3d spectrum, (c) F 1s spectrum, and (d) Ti 2p

spectrum of the NFTS sample. In Figure 3, the UV-visible diffusion reflectance spectrum of the anatase NFTSs shows an obvious red shift in the absorption edge compared with P25. This result clearly directs a decrease in the band gap energy (E g) of NFTSs, which can be obtained from a plot of (αhν)1/2 versus photon energy (hν). The narrower band gap could cause a lower oxidation power of the photoinduced holes [2], Fossariinae which suggests higher photocatalytic activity. Figure 3 UV-visible diffusion reflectance spectra of the NFTSs and P25. Inset: plots of (αhν)1/2 versus photon energy (hν). The absorption peak of the MO solution appears at 467 nm, as shown in Figure 4a. With the time prolongation of irradiation, the peak value declines rapidly due to NFTSs. To evaluate the photocatalytic activities of the NFTSs and P25 on degradation of MO, the functions of ln(A 0/A) versus time are plotted in Figure 4b, where A denotes the absorption of MO changing with illumination time and A 0 the initial absorption at 467 nm. The plots are linear, and the slope k can represent the photocatalytic speed (min−1) of the powder. The NFTSs (k NFTSs = 5.61 × 10−3) show 20.1% higher photocatalytic speed than P25 (k P25 = 4.67 × 10−3).