We chose a fixed, rectangular region of interest (ROI) that in all images corresponded to 106 pixels. The injury site was always represented inside this ROI by manually placing the box in the correct position on each image. The aniline blue-positive

pixels were partially automated by using the magic wand tool set to a color tolerance of 60. This tolerance setting resulted in highlighted pixels with a range of blue that corresponded precisely with the histological appearance of osseous tissue in the aniline blue-stained sections. Native bone or bone fragments resulting from the drill injury were manually deselected. The total number of aniline blue-positive see more pixels for each section was recorded. The pixel counts from individual sections were averaged for each sample, and the differences within and among treatment groups were calculated based on these averages. Results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to quantify differences described in this article. P ≤ 0.01 was considered to be significant. The skeleton contains

tissue-resident stem cells that are responsible for maintaining bone mass [22] and for regenerating new bone following injury [23]. By genetic cell lineage labeling studies [24], selleck products we established that adult skeletal stem cells arise from the cranial neural crest and the mesoderm [23]. Although both stem cell populations give rise to cartilage and bone, they do not appear to be functionally equivalent: Neural crest-derived skeletal progenitor cells, which occupy the first branchial arch (Figs. 1A,B) and give rise to the bones and cartilages of the upper and lower jaws (Figs. 1C–F) exhibit robust plasticity compared to mesoderm-derived progenitor cells, most notably in bone grafting assays [25]. Our initial hypothesis was that implant osseointegration in the tibia would be equivalent to implant osseointegration in the maxilla. Since the two bones are derived

from different embryonic stem cell populations, however, we directly tested the healing potentials of the tibia compared to the maxilla. We employed a simple bone defect model in which a 1.0 mm hole was created in a mesoderm-derived long bone, the tibia, or a neural crest-derived cranial bone, the maxilla (Figs. 1G,H). The surrounding cortices were left intact, which minimized micromotion of the injured bones. There was no obvious difference in the histologic Morin Hydrate appearance of the injury sites within the first few days of creating the defects (Fig. 1H and data not shown). By post-injury day 14, however, there was a clear distinction: tibial injuries were filled with newly woven bone that occupied the marrow cavity and bridged the defect (Fig. 1I). In contrast, a similar injury in the maxilla was filled with a fibrous connective tissue (Fig. 1J). Even if we reduced the diameter of the maxillary defects (compare 1.0 mm in the tibia with 0.5 in the maxilla), the maxillary injuries did not heal by day 14.