There
SCH772984 ic50 was no consistent pattern associating samples in which antibody was below the limit of detection with either the weight of the sample recovered or the total IgG or IgA content. Intramuscular immunisation of animals in Group A resulted in the appearance or the boosting of mucosally-detected antibodies in 3 of the 4 macaques. Furthermore, antibody titres were more stable than those seen after intravaginal immunisation alone over the study period (Fig. 1). Interestingly, in E53, where serum antibodies were undetectable before intramuscular boosting but showed an anamnestic response upon boosting, only IgG antibody was detectable locally despite total IgA concentrations of 2118–70,528 U ml−1 and 1338–28,838 U ml−1 in cervical and vaginal samples RG7204 molecular weight respectively (Table 2). The IgG antibody was unlikely due to blood contamination as in only one cervical sample was haemoglobin detected. In the two animals in which antibody had previously been detected mucosally both IgG and IgA antibody titres were boosted. In E54, peak titres for IgG antibody of 2500 and 5582 were detected in cervical and vaginal samples respectively compared to peak titres of 295 and 563 respectively prior to intramuscular boosting. Likewise IgA antibody peak titres of 1086 and 1522 were detected
in cervical and vaginal samples respectively compared to peak titres of 169 and 264 respectively prior to intramuscular immunisation. Similarly in E55 peak titres for IgG antibody increased from 186 to 3360 and from 528 to 1719 in cervical and vaginal samples respectively and for peak titres of IgA from 242 to 1243 and from 355 to 515 respectively. Despite accelerated
(anamnestic) serum responses following intramuscular boosting, in no case was a local anamnestic response detected. Animal E56 had no mucosally-detected antibody despite seroconversion; however, total IgG and IgA concentrations were consistently low in mucosal samples from Isotretinoin this animal (Table 2). In contrast, IgG was usually detected in both cervical and vaginal samples from Group B animals following a single intramuscular immunisation when observed over a similar period of time (Fig. 2), but in any one animal this was irregular and overall at much lower titres than detected in animals E53, E54 and E55 that had received intravaginal priming (cervical gmt 63 versus 1298, and vaginal gmt 65 versus 1511; P < 0.001; Mann–Whitney rank sum test). Similarly, where detected, cervical and vaginal IgA titres were higher when intramuscular immunisation was preceded by intravaginal priming; however the small sample size precluded statistical analysis.