SRT) format While the standardization

SRT) format.While the standardization likewise of subtitles as part of HTML5 video and audio components is still being debated [6], novel approaches for video subtitling within web-based environments are required for the exploration of video accessibility within AmI environments. This article presents an alternative design strategy for implementing customizable subtitle systems for a variety of platforms and devices. It takes advantage of the native support for Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) and the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) [7] within HTML5 documents for presenting synchronized subtitles on any web-capable device with the appropriate browser. The current platform’s support for the proposed solution is also analyzed, both for desktop environments and for those of mobile and TV.
Furthermore, Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries in order to demonstrate the viability and support for the proposed solution, three instances for the use of the application for video subtitling have been created: (1) a web widget to extend the functionality of an HTML5 video component, enabling user modifications to the language Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries and format of the subtitles; (2) an add-on for smart TV platforms that improves subtitle readability when the user interface combines video with other interactive content; and (3) a mobile application to enable multi-screen capabilities within a home environment (as an example of an AmI environment) to receive TV subtitles on the mobile device regardless of the native runtime of the device.
The rest of the article is structured as follows: Section 2 analyzes the pros and cons of deploying Web applications compared to native applications; Section 3 presents an approach to synchronizing web-based video subtitles using Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries SVG and SMIL; Section 4 analyzes Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries the current platform support for the proposed approach; Section 5 presents examples GSK-3 of the use of the application in order to demonstrate the flexibility and viability of the solution; Section 6 describes the user experience evaluation conducted to validate the quality and acceptability of the application proposed as a solution for multi-screen systems; and finally Section 7 outlines the paper’s conclusions and discusses the future.2.?Web Applications vs. Native Applications on Mobile PlatformsWith the explosion in the popularity of smart devices and different marketplaces for applications, and the enhancement of Web technologies led by HTML5, it seems natural to analyze the pros and cons of building native applications vs.
the development and maintenance of Web sites. This section compares the two, and selleck compound justifies our choice for building the presented subtitling system for AmI environments, taking advantage of HTML5 capabilities.2.1. Platform SupportNative applications need to be specifically built for every target platform. Thus, application providers must take into account the number and types of target platforms in order to address the application to each one’s individual needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>