of cutlery per min) 11.1 3.9 0.5 3.2 0.057 1.2 3.6 0.025* Myofeedback training 10.5 3.6 1.1 2.8 0.036* MEK162 mw 0.4 3.4 0.378 Musc. strength training 10.7 3.8 0.1 3.6 0.985 0.2 3.3 0.903 Control 12.2 4.3 0.4 3.2 0.312 2.8 3.7 0.006** Grip strength 25.3 8.3 −0.1
3.2 0.760 0.0 3.9 0.868 Myofeedback training 25.1 9.8 −0.3 3.7 0.881 0.4 4.0 0.691 Musc. strength training 25.5 7.3 0.5 2.9 0.561 0.5 3.5 0.463 Control 25.2 7.8 −0.5 3.0 0.741 −0.8 4.3 0.487 Dexterity/gross movements 13.8 2.4 0.5 2.0 0.070 0.2 2.1 0.484 Myofeedback training 14.0 2.3 0.4 1.7 0.196 0.3 1.9 0.508 Musc. strength training 13.3 2.7 0.9 2.4 0.153 0.8 2.7 0.253 Control 14.2 2.3 0.2 2.0 0.783 −0.4 1.8 0.299 Self-rated health and pain Mental health (0–100)a 51.8 22.1 6.4 21.7 0.028* 6.2 22.9 0.101 Myofeedback training 57.7 21.5 2.2 22.0 0.818 −2.1 18.4 0.492 Musc. strength training 47.0 22.7 10.5 23.9 0.079 16.5 VS-4718 clinical trial 27.8 0.042* Control 50.4 21.5 6.7 19.3 0.032* 5.4 19.5 0.310 Vitality (0–100)a 36.6 19.3 3.4 17.6 0.120 7.9 20.0 0.016* Myofeedback training 36.7 19.0 6.3 16.6 0.129 10.0 15.1 0.021* Musc. strength training 35.7 20.4 2.6 21.2 0.604 12.0 26.2 0.129 Control 37.8 19.4 1.1 15.0 0.787 2.1 17.7 0.922 Pain ID-8 in the neck (0–10)b 6.1 1.9 −0.1 1.6 0.661 0.3 2.1 0.388 Myofeedback training 6.0 1.9 −0.7 1.4 0.046* −0.1 2.0 0.795 Musc. strength training 6.3 1.4 −0.1 1.7 0.974 −0.3 1.8 0.529 Control 6.2 2.5 0.5 1.6 0.292
1.1 2.2 0.046* a Baseline measure (T1) varied from 0 to 3 months before intervention start b P value based on Student’s t-test due to normally distributed data * P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01 Laboratory-observed work ability Among the whole study group, the results of the cutlery wiping performance test improved at the follow-up (Table 2). Self-rated health and pain At baseline, most participants rated high pain in the neck region and poor health (Table 1). About 70% of the participants in the myofeedback group and about 50% of the intensive strength training and control group had a comorbidity of mental disorder (self-rated, but diagnosed by a physician) (Table 1). Working OICR-9429 in vitro degree The mean working degree was at baseline 15% among intervention groups and 13% among the controls.