“
“In the present study karyotypes and chromosomes of five species of the family Opisthorchiidae (Opisthorchis felineus (Rivolta, 1884), O. viverrini (Poirier, 1886), Metorchis xanthosomus (Creplin, 1846), M. bills (Braun, 1893), and Clonorchis sinensis (Cobbold, 1875)) were compared. Karyotypes of O. felineus, M. xanthosomus, M. bills and C. sinensis consist of two pairs of large meta- and submetacentrics and five pairs of small chromosomes (2n = GSK3235025 order 14). The karyotype of O. viverrini is 2n = 12, which indicates a fusion of two chromosomes of opisthorchid ancestral karyotype. Analysis of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes was performed by heterologous in situ hybridization of microdissected DNA
probes obtained from chromosomes 1 and 2 of O. felineus and chromosomes 1 and 2 of M. xanthosomus. Results of chromosome staining (C- and AgNOR-banding) and FISH of telomeric probes and ribosomal DNA probe
on opisthorchid chromosomes were used for chromosome comparison. Data on chromosome number in opisthorchid species were also discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Background. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein graft disease is hampered by high rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI). The use of embolic protection devices (EPD) during these interventions is a class IB recommendation when technically feasible, yet they are used routinely in less than half selleck compound of all cases. Our aim was to explore whether or not the under-utilization of EPDs led to any untoward cardiovascular events. Methods. Consecutive vein graft interventions from 2003-2008 were identified and stratified by EPD use. Information
pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and procedural details was collected. Primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of periprocedural MI, defined as any creatinine kinase-MB fraction Apoptosis inhibitor elevation greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal between patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) with EPD versus patients who underwent PCI for SVG without EPD. Secondary endpoints included comparison of the incidence of recurrent ischemia, MI, revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]), and mortality in the above 2 groups by the end of 1 year. Results. A total of 164 consecutive vein graft interventions were identified. EPDs were used in 71 cases (43.4%). The EPD group was further out since their CABG and had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. Periprocedural MI occurred in 22 cases; 12 in the non-EPD group and 10 in the EPD group (14.1 vs 12.9%; P=.82). The composite endpoint of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization at 12 months was significantly lower when EPDs were used (11.3 vs 25.8%; P=.03). On multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease increased the risk of periprocedural MI (odds ratio [OR], 5.