In Mali it was reported that there had been no more Men A outbreaks since the new vaccine introduction.

This meant that expensive reactive campaigns were avoided. However, the campaign disrupted routine services, which had the perceived knock-on effect of reducing facilities’ revenues from those services. Although the new vaccine campaigns ran for a limited time only, in the Malian context where there are frequent short-term campaigns, these routine service interruptions could add up to considerable regular disruption [22]. Overall, both benefits and drawbacks of campaign-delivered introductions seemed to be limited to the duration of the campaigns. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first study to focus specifically on the impact of new vaccine introductions on http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-888.html the broader health system in low- and middle-income countries. Our study found that the new vaccines generally integrated well and as such, had little or no impact on most aspects

of the EPI and even less on the broader health system. Effects outside of EPI were minimal or limited to a few cases where a deliberate effort was made to combine activities. Our findings showed that there were limited inter-departmental collaborations SKI606 during introduction planning and this may explain why the impacts were more narrowly circumscribed to immunisation. Perhaps the most surprising finding was the lack of impact on coverage rates for other vaccines (apart from a transient effect for PCV13 in Mali) and the discord between this finding (from the routine data) and the perceived increase reported by interviewees and facility respondents. Some studies have reported a perceived increase in these health service use following the introduction of services or new vaccines [3] and [16], however, others found no change [6] and [12]. Our results suggest that findings based on perceptions of increased service use should be treated with caution. The finding

that the introduction of an additional vaccine did not have many negative impacts, particularly for components such as the cold chain capacity (except in Guatemala, where planning was minimal), is a testament to the value of introduction preparations. It has been shown elsewhere that vial size affects supply chain requirements and vaccine availability [23] and there is recognition of the general need for additional cold chain for new vaccine introductions [11], [24] and [25]. It should not be forgotten that health systems are dynamic; fortuitous changes in the presentation of other vaccines as well as other concurrent initiatives (e.g. increasing staffing) as reported in this study, cannot be relied upon for future vaccine introductions.