However, no statistical significance (p > 0.05) in t1/2 was found among the studied dose groups. The duration of action of 50% of BCQB (t1/2, off-set) in learn more classical bioassays

was approximately 3 hours,[11] which was check details shorter than the terminal t1/2 of BCQB in plasma. It may be due to the fact that the terminal t1/2 in plasma is reflective of the rate of drug elimination from the body but not reflective of the duration of drug action. In the multiple-dose study, the steady-state concentration was achieved within 3 days of consecutive dosing and the pharmacokinetic parameters of BCQB were similar to those following single dose except AUC. A slight accumulation was noted with the mean Rac of 1.26 based on AUCτ, but the slight accumulation resulted in sustained plasma exposure upon daily dosing. A high DF for BCQB concentration in plasma was observed, for the concentrations of BCQB in plasma declined rapidly from tmax to τ. Wide inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was reflected in their SD (tables III and IV), but the

reasons were not clear. There are several factors that can lead to the variability of pharmacokinetic parameters. First, although physicians administered BCQB carefully according to the SOPs, the intranasal administration process may cause variability. For example, while intranasal doses were administered to the lateral nasal wall, the influence of factors (such as posture, position of the head, and nasal mucosal blood

flow) could increase the variability of pharmacokinetic parameters. Second, the presence of nasal ZD1839 datasheet mucosal physiology and pathology is another potential source of variability.[28] For example, hyperemia would be expected to influence drug absorption after intranasal application, for the hyperemia can change the penetration of nasal mucosa, which may influence drug absorption. Third, only ten subjects had been studied for the pharmacokinetic profile in each group and the variability in one or more individual would affect the overall results greatly. Future clinical studies should also seek to identify the factors responsible for variability in intranasal dose delivery, deposition and mucosa absorption in order to optimize the safety profile of BCQB that could often be required for long-term therapy. In this FIH AZD9291 ic50 study, repeated administration of BCQB did not lead to any cardiovascular adverse event in healthy subjects, consistent with previously published results in animals.[13,14] However, future investigations to evaluate the effect of long-term doses of BCQB on the nasal mucosa, ECG and heart rate are warranted. Conclusion BCQB was safe and well tolerated in this FIH study. No SAEs occurred, no change of ECG and heart rate was observed, and all subjects were in good compliance. The mean Cmax and AUC of BCQB were proportional to the studied doses, and the steady state was achieved within 3 days.