Familial Cancer: 1–10 Watson MS, Greene CL (2001) Points

to consider in preventing unfair discrimination based on genetic disease risk: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics. Genet Med 3(6):436–437PubMedCrossRef Watters v. White (2012). QCCA, vol 257. Quebec Court of Appeal Werner-Lin AV (2007) Danger zones: risk perceptions Gemcitabine clinical trial of young women from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Fam Process 46(3):335–349PubMedCrossRef Wiseman M, Dancyger C, Michie S (2010) Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review. Familial Cancer 9(4):691–703PubMedCrossRef”
“Introduction In the context of the Human Genome Project, high expectations have been raised that the face of clinical care would be changed drastically by the short-term arrival of improved diagnostics and therapeutics developed by harnessing –omics platforms. Most notably at the moment, expectations have run high that efforts in the discovery and validation of biomarkers could provide new tools for rational drug development, INCB28060 for diagnostic interventions and for tailoring treatments based on individuals’ molecular make-up (“personalised medicine”) (Yap et

al. 2010). Despite their potential for clinical innovation, few new interventions drawing directly from these advances have in fact reached regulatory approval, and less still have been successfully adopted in the clinic DNA Damage inhibitor (Pisano 2006; Martin et al. 2009; Janssens and van Duijn 2010; Swinney and Anthony 2011; Anonymous 2012; Hoelder et al. 2012). Commentators have thus, in recent years, decried a situation where the biomedical field would be sitting on a gold mine of basic post-genomic research just waiting to be properly exploited into clinical innovation. A parallel, but more recent development has also contributed to shaping perceptions

that investments in biomedical research are increasingly disconnected from improvements in clinical practice and, especially, in therapeutic modalities. With a landmark 2004 report of the US Food and Drug Administration, biomedical actors worldwide started discussing the possibility of an impending crisis of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry sector (FDA 2004). Large pharmaceutical companies have recently had to engage in heavy personnel cuts, because of a historical conjuncture where the blockbuster products, usually drugs, which https://www.selleckchem.com/products/prt062607-p505-15-hcl.html provided them with most of their revenues are falling off patent without having been gradually replaced with new such blockbusters (MacIlwain 2011; Mittra et al. 2011). Yet, advances in post-genomic platforms were expected to replenish the sources of innovation in pharmaceutical research and technology development (RTD).