A total of 102 polyps were evaluated by NBI in real time during therapeutic colonoscopy by one experienced endoscopist. Whether magnification would be used together or not was determined by randomization. this website After prediction of histology, all lesions were endoscopically excised. Surgical pathology was used as the criterion standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of identifying neoplastic polyps were calculated. Results: A total of 102 lesions, with an average size of 5.9 mm (range 3–12), in 40 patients were assessed – 79
adenomas, 20 hyperplastic, and 3 others. The sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions with optical magnification were 77.7%, 50.0%, 84.8% and 38.5%, respectively, while the Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV without optical magnification were 83.7%, 42.9%, 81.8% and 46.2%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 71.7% when prediction was done with optical magnification while SB203580 mouse that was 77.2% when it
was done without optical magnification. Conclusion: Use of NBI colonoscopy without optical magnification distinguishes neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps as accurately as that with optical magnification. NBI colonoscopy without optical magnification for neoplastic polyp diagnosis appears to be comparable with NBI with optical magnification. Key Word(s): 1. Narrow Band Imaging; 2. Colonoscopy; 3. Colorectal Polyps; 4. Histology; Presenting Author: HUI NA Additional Authors: QIN TAO Corresponding Author: HUI NA Affiliations: Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases Objective: To assess wether dietetic education by nurse can improve the quality of bowel preparation in outpatients. Methods: Outpatients with colonoscopy 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 were ramdomly assigned to dietetic education (DE) group and conventional education (CE) group. Subjects in DE group received dietetic education by nurse on the day of appointment. Dietetic education including importance and contents of the appropriate dit. Data including adequate bowel preparation
rate, dietetic compliance rate, completion rate of colonoscopy and polyp detection rate were record. Results: A total of 422 patients were randomised, 211 to DE group and 211 to control group. Dietetic education by nurse can significantly improve adequate bowel preparation rate (91.9% vs. 75.4%, p < 0.001), dietetic compliance rate (83.9% vs. 51.2%, p < 0.001), completion rate of colonoscopy (95.7% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.002) and polyp detection rate (31.3% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001)(table. 1). Multivariate regression analysis revealed dietetic education (OR = 2.47, 95CI:1.29–4.74, p = 0.007), constipation (OR = 2.42, 95CI:1.27–4.62, p = 0.007) and diet (OR = 2.98, 95CI:1.64–5.43, p < 0.001) were factors significantly associated with the quality of bowel preparation.