9% of eyes (70/96; 95% confidence interval, 63.9-82.0). This hyporeflective band appeared to be within the OPL. Using eccentric SD-OCT acquisition, the boundaries between the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and Henle’s fiber layer (HFL) were well defined, showing that the ONL ends before the margin of atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). A narrow hyperreflective band separated the margin of the ONL and RPE from the hyporeflective band, already within the atrophic area.\n\nConclusions: A hyporeflective wedge-shaped structure appears frequently within the boundaries of the OPL in patients with GA secondary to AMD, corresponding to an increase in the width of the HFL, presumably

because of axonal swelling

or interaxonal edema. This finding may improve the interpretation of SD-OCT images of the outer layers, may help in understanding better the Selleckchem Batimastat interactions between photoreceptor cells and the RPE, and may help in the development of monitoring techniques and therapies for GA secondary to AMD.\n\nFinancial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2012;xx:xxx (C) 2012 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.”
“Background: The elderly population is increasing in Vietnam. Access to health services for the elderly is often limited, especially for those in rural areas. User fees at public health care facilities and out-of-pocket payments for health care services H 89 manufacturer are major barriers to access. With the aim of helping the poor access public health care services and reduce health care expenditures (HCE), the Health Care Funds for the Poor policy (HCFP) was implemented in 2002. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of this policy AC220 mouse on elderly households.\n\nMethods: Elderly households were defined as households which have at least one person aged 60 years or older. The impacts of HCFP on elderly household HCE as a percentage of total expenditure and health care utilization were assessed by a double-difference

propensity score matching method using panel data of 3,957 elderly households in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2007, of which 509 were classifies as “treated” (i.e. covered by the policy). Variables included in a logistic regression for estimating the propensity scores to match the treated with the control households, were household and household-head characteristics.\n\nResults: In the first time period (2001-2003) there were no significant differences between treated and controls. This can be explained by the delay in implementing the policy by the local governments. In the second (2001-2005) and third period (2001-2007) the utilizations of Communal Health Stations (CHS) and go-to-pharmacies were significant. The treated were using CHS and pharmacies more between 2001 and 2007 while control households decreased their use.