2A). It was expected that ampicillin and piperacillin would show similar effects on the heatflow curves at subinhibitory concentrations. However, this

was not the case (Fig. 2A). Although it was not possible to determine the MIC for ampicillin, one can see that 8 mg l-1 ampicillin only decreased P max and had no effect on the detection time for bacterial activity, in contrast Selonsertib chemical structure to piperacillin. It is an indication that E. coli metabolism reacts differently with each of the antibiotics. Further analysis of this difference was beyond the scope of this study. Amikacin and gentamycin are both aminoglycosides acting on the 30S ribosome by inhibition of the translocation of the growing polypeptide chain from the A to the P site [20]. The same mode of action is clearly demonstrated in the profile of the IMC heatflow curves (Fig. 3A). There are only minor differences between the heatflow this website curves which may mostly reflect variations GDC 941 introduced by manual preparation of the samples. The heat curves, however, differ a bit more (Fig. 3B). This was most likely due to a reduced activity of the amikacin used as evidenced by finding an MIC above the recommendations of the CLSI [15]. It would be interesting to see whether antibiotics interacting with protein synthesis but with another site of action (like chloramphenicol on S. aureus) could also be differentiated as is the case for S. aureus (see above).

Conclusion We were able to show that isothermal microcalorimetry could

be a powerful tool for MIC determination of antibiotics for any cultivable bacterium. There was no time saving possible since MICs were based on the conventional approach – evidence of growth at 24 hours. However, it is clear that determining MICs by IMC has the added advantage of allowing detailed comparative evaluation of the effects of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations on growth-related thermodynamic activity of bacteria. http://www.selleck.co.jp/products/s-gsk1349572.html Furthermore, our study showed that the results are in agreement with the tests performed with a standard method by CLSI (broth dilution method). We summarized the results in Table 1 to provide an easy comparison with the addition t delay and P max of one concentration below the MIC to show how calorimetry data indicate the mode of bacterial action. It might be possible to use an IMC approach to reduce the time for MIC determinations. For example, one might be able to develop a method to analyze the first few hours of IMC data for a series of antibiotic concentrations mathematically and extrapolate the MIC value. Also, by knowing the dissociation constant of an antibiotic, it would be possible to quantitatively characterize the inhibitory effect using the methods described in the study of Antoce et al. [11]. This might allow help extrapolation to the MIC value for a given antibiotic. It seems likely that IMC studies of the type described here could be useful in antibiotic research and development.