, 2001) (Fig. 1). The performance of these genetic tools for tagging various Gram-negative bacteria was compared. The three different vectors were chosen for their difference selleck inhibitor in antibiotic selection gene (gentamycin, tetracyclin and kanamycin, respectively) and the opportunities for maintenance as a plasmid (pBBRMCS-5 and pME6031) or integration into the chromosome (pBK-miniTn7). In addition, pBBRMCS-5 (a derivative of the general cloning vector pBBR) is assumed to have a higher copy number than pME6031 (containing the pVS1 replicon). pME6031 was described as being maintainable without the selective

pressure of tetracyclin (Heeb et al., 2000). All vectors were reported to have a broad

host range in Gram-negative bacteria. Pseudomonas putida strain PCL1445, which is an excellent root colonizer and is able to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces such as polyvinylchloride (Kuiper et al., 2004a), was selected to examine the new constructs containing mcherry. Growth curves of the transformed strains did not show an effect of the constructs BMN 673 purchase and mcherry expression on growth (data not shown). However, care should be taken when using these plasmids under other growth conditions. As expected, the pME6031-derived plasmid pMP7604 was maintained without antibiotic pressure (no loss was observed), whereas the pBBRMCS-5-derived plasmid pMP7607 showed a loss of 3% in cells of the population after 3 days of subculturing without antibiotic pressure. Qualitative and quantitative analyses showed that all constructs can be used for visualization at the single-cell level and that the intensity of fluorescence resulting from the use of the different Tacrolimus (FK506) genetic constructs correlates with the copy number of the different plasmids and the transposon used (Fig. 2). The mcherry constructs created were shown to be functional in different Pseudomonas spp. (i.e. P. putida PCL1445, P. fluorescens WCS365 and P. aeruginosa PAO1) and the fish pathogen E. tarda, with comparable mCherry production

levels (Fig. 3). In addition, fluorescence was observed during cloning in E. coli. Labeled strains under in vitro (biofilm formation on glass) and in vivo (tomato root colonization) conditions showed that the constructs are well suited for the visualization at the single-cell level (Figs 4 and 5). In addition, tagging with the mcherry plasmid constructs was shown to be useful for the simultaneous visualization with the eGFP-tagged strain of P. putida PCL1445 as shown for biofilms formed on glass and tomato roots (Fig. 5). Also, single strains tagged with eGFP and mCherry were recently shown to be useful for bioreporter studies (Tecon et al., 2009). The vectors constructed in this study could function as markers to locate bacteria in such studies.