Calibration standards covered the theoretical concentration range of 0.5–200 ng/mL gemigliptin (R 2 > 0.996) and 0.5–100 ng/mL LC15-0636 (R 2 > 0.996). Using this assay, the accuracy of the

calibration standard curve for gemigliptin was between 91.3 and 113.6 %, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the back-calculated concentration was <6.2 %. The accuracy of the quality control (QC) samples for gemigliptin was between 103.2 and 105.6 %, with CVs between 6.0 and 6.5 %. The accuracy of the calibration standard curve for LC15–0636 was between 87.4 and 114.0 %, and the CV of the back-calculated concentration was <5.7 %. The accuracy of the QC samples for LC15-0636 was between 101.0 and 104.1 %, with CVs between 7.3 and 7.7 %. The lower limit of quantifications (LLOQ) for gemigliptin and LC15-0636 were 0.5 ng/mL. All assays were conducted in a blinded manner in terms of treatment, sequence, and period. buy GSK458 2.4.2 Glimepiride Selleckchem LY411575 analysis Plasma concentrations of glimepiride selleck compound and its metabolite

M1 were determined using LC–MS/MS. An IS solution (50 ng/mL) was prepared by dissolving glimepiride-d5 and trans-hydroxy glimepiride-d5 in methanol. A sample aliquot (50 μL) and aliquot of IS solution (150 μL) were mixed. The mixture was vortexed and then centrifuged in a precooled (4 °C) centrifuge for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. An aliquot of the supernatant (100 μL) was taken, mixed with 50 μL water, vortexed, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. Five microliters of each sample was injected

into the LC–MS/MS system for analysis. The sample extracts were analyzed using HPLC (Shimadzu Prominence, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA; autosampler: Shiseido Z3133, Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) over a Thermo Fisher Scientific Hypersil Gold column (5 μm, 100.0 × 2.1 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA) in binary mode [the mobile phase consisted of solvent A (water with 0.1 % FA) and Erastin ic50 solvent B (methanol with 0.1 % FA)]. The MS system was an AB Sciex QTRAP 4000 (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) that was operated in positive electrospray ionization mode with MRM. For glimepiride and M1, the precursor-to-production reactions monitored were m/z 491.4 → 352.2 and 507.3 → 352.2, respectively. Calibration standards covered 1–200 ng/mL of the theoretical concentration range of glimepiride (R 2 > 0.996); 0.5–100 ng/mL of M1 (R 2 > 0.998). For glimepiride, the accuracy was between 97.5 and 102.0 %, and CV of the back-calculated concentration was <8.7 %. For the metabolite M1, the accuracy was between 98.7 and 101.2 %, and the CV of the back-calculated concentration was <7.6 %. The accuracy of the QC samples was between 97.2 and 100.4 %, with CVs of 5.5–8.2 % for glimepiride, while the accuracy of the QC samples was between 98.1 and 101.7 %, and the CVs were between 3.9 and 6.2 % for M1. LLOQ was 1 ng/mL for glimepiride and 0.5 ng/mL for M1.