001 Figure 3A), but we failed to find a relationship between its
expression and clinical grades of glioma. Our data also showed a much lower level of miR-128 in high grades glioma GANT61 manufacturer (grade IV and III) than low grades glioma (grade II) (Figure 3B, P < 0.008); however, no difference was found between grade III and grade IV (Figure 3B, P > 0.008). There are significant difference in expression levels of miR-342-3p between grade II, III and IV (Figure 3C, P < 0.008). Plasma level of miR-342-3p was notably decreased in glioma with ascending tumor grades. Figure 3 The relationship between the plasma levels of miR-21, miR-128 and miR-342-3p and classification of glioma. (A) Levels of miR-21 were up-regulated in grade II in comparison with control cohorts and much higher in grade III cohorts than in grade II cohorts, however there were no significant difference
between glioblastoma patients (grade IV) and grade III cohorts or grade II cohorts. (B) Levels of miR-128 were significantly lower in grade II cohorts than in normal cohorts, much lower in grade III cohorts and in glioblastoma patients than in grade II cohorts (P < 0.001), there were no significant difference between glioblastoma patients and grade III cohorts. (C) Levels of miR-342-3p were significant difference among all formation. * P<0.008 in comparison with normal, # P < 0.008 in comparison with glioma II, △ P < 0.008 in comparison with glioma III. Changes of miR-21, miR-128 and miR-342-3p levels in plasma samples of GBM patients after operation and chemo-radiation We chose 10 GBM patients and collected their plasma in preoperation, postoperation and after buy Blebbistatin chemo-radiation.
We found that the levels of miR-21 did not show significant difference between cohorts of preoperation and postoperation (P = 0.393), however, the levels of miR-21 was observably reduced after chemo-radiation (P < 0.001, Figure 4A). Furthermore, our data also revealed that the levels of miR-128 and miR-342-3p were markedly distinct between cohorts of preoperation, postoperation and chemo-radiation (P < 0.001, Figure 4B and C). After patients were treated by operation and chemo-radiation, the levels of miR-21, miR-128 and miR-342-3p revived to second normal levels and did not differ significantly between chemo-radiation cohort and controls (P > 0.008). Figure 4 The miR-21, miR-128 and miR-342-3p expression in normal control (n = 10), preoperation (n =10), postoperation (n = 10) and chemo-radiation (n = 10) plasma samples. (A) Plasma levels of miR-21 are not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative patients, but levels of miR-21 are significantly lower in chemo-radiation cohorts. (B) and (C) Levels of miR-128 and miR-342-3p showed significant difference between cohorts of preoperation and postoperation and chemo-radiation. * P < 0.008 in comparison with normal, # P < 0.008 in comparison with preoperation, △ P < 0.008 in comparison with postoperation.