7c) leading to a deleterious effect on cell viability after (fig. 7a). It is important to note, that BSO as a single agent had no significant effect on cell viability, apoptosis and necrosis in this particular cell line (fig. 7a-c). Figure 6 Effects selleck chemicals llc of N-acetylcysteine on Taurolidine induced cell death in AsPC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. AsPC-1 (a-c) and BxPC-3 cells (d-f) were incubated with either the radical scavenger N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (5 mM), Taurolidine (TRD) (250 μM for BxPC-3 and 1000 μM for AsPC-1) or the combination of both

agents (TRD 250 μM/1000 μM + NAC 5 mM) and with Povidon 5% (control) for 24 h. The percentages of viable (a, d), apoptotic (b, e) and necrotic cells (c, f) were determined by FACS-analysis for Annexin V-FITC and Propidiumiodide. Values are means ± SEM of 4 independent experiments with consecutive passages. Asterisk symbols on brackets indicate differences between treatment groups. *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, *

p ≤ 0.05 (one-way ANOVA). Figure 7 Effects of DL-buthionin-(S,R)-sulfoximine on Taurolidine Erismodegib induced cell death in AsPC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. AsPC-1 (a-c) and BxPC-3 cells (d-f) were incubated with either the glutathione depleting agent DL-buthionin-(S,R)-sulfoximine(BSO) (1 mM), Taurolidine (TRD) (250 μM for BxPC-3 and 1000 μM for AsPC-1) or the combination of both agents (TRD 250 μM/1000 μM + BSO 1 mM) and with Povidon 5% (control) for 24 h. The percentages of viable (a, d), apoptotic (b, e) and necrotic cells (c, f) were determined by FACS-analysis for Annexin V-FITC and Propidiumiodide. Values are means ± SEM of 4 independent experiments with consecutive passages. Asterisk symbols on brackets indicate

differences between treatment groups. *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05 (one-way ANOVA). The second pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC3, showed some similarities with AsPC-1 cells regarding the response during to NAC and BSO co-incubation (fig. 6+7;d-f). A partial protective effect of NAC co-incubation could be demonstrated leading to a significant increase in viable cells compared to TRD alone without full Selleck RG7112 recovery compared to untreated controls (fig. 6d). This partial recovery by NAC was again related to a reduction of necrotic cells compared to TRD alone (fig. 6f) (table 2). Unlike AsPC-1 cells, BxPC-3 cells responded to BSO as a single agent with a significant reduction of viable cells compared to untreated controls (fig. 7d+f). Nevertheless, there was again a significant deleterious effect of BSO co-incubation with TRD on cell viability compared to TRD or BSO alone (fig. 7d), which was related to a strong enhancement of apoptosis (fig. 7e). Chang Liver cells responded least to NAC and BSO co-incubation (fig. 4+5; d-f).