[13, 17]

Donor site morbidity is minimal with UFFFs, which may be related to preserved hand vasculature. However, because some patients may suffer from impairment of hand function, possibly related to dissection of the nerve, the non-dominant arm is recommended for flap harvest with tension-free wound closure when possible.[16] Due to the location of the flap, the donor site can often be closed directly, but if skin grafting is needed, the graft is applied over muscle bellies, allowing better wound healing in comparison to closure of RFFFs.[13] The donor site is also located on the ulnar and volar areas of forearm, which is visibly less noticeable and therefore cosmetically more appealing than other flaps, particularly Sorafenib research buy the RFFF.[13, 17] The UFFF is not only an excellent alternative to the RFFF, but also it may in fact have certain perceived advantages for its use in head and neck reconstruction. This thin, pliable flap can be used reliably and without significant donor site morbidity, flap loss, or wound healing complications, per the studies reviewed. With the surgical community Selleck ITF2357 beginning to recognize

that this particular flap will not necessarily lead to hand ischemia, the ulnar forearm free flap may become a preferred flap for use in head and neck reconstruction. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. “
“Secondary reconstruction of lower extremity defects using local tissues is demanding and fraught with potential complications. Reconstructive efforts may be challenged by pre-existing scarring, Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase paucity of recipient vessels, and patient co-morbidities limiting tolerance for prolonged and extensive surgery. We present a case of an 81-year-old male with a recurrent malignant melanoma invading the proximal and middle third of the tibia, who previously

underwent reconstruction with the medial gastrocnemius muscle and a skin graft. After wide local re-excision and tibia fixation, a 12 cm × 28 cm reverse anterolateral thigh flap was used for soft tissue coverage. Because of the relatively large size of the flap based upon retrograde flow, we elected to supercharge the flap to augment its blood supply. Supercharging of the flap pedicle was accomplished by anastamosing the lateral circumflex femoral vessels to the anterior tibial vessels. The donor site wasclosed primarily. The flap survived entirely and successfully endured subsequent radiation therapy. Supercharging enhances reliability of the reverse anterolateral thigh flap, and thus, permits harvest of large tissue bulk for coverage of up to proximal two-thirds of the tibia.This is the first report describing successful supercharging of a large reverse anterolateral thigh flap which resulted in entire flap survival.