This minimal invasive NVP-LDE225 concentration surgical approach was reported to be successful even in cases where the posterior wall of the frontal sinus was already affected.[42] In a study by Hachem et al. [43], 39 cases of invasive Aspergillus sinusitis were analysed regarding the outcome between the group of 13 patients who received sinus surgery and the group of the remaining 26 patients, who received systemic antifungal therapy alone. Overall response among neutropenic patients with invasive

Aspergillus sinusitis was 53.2% (7/13) in those who underwent sinus surgery and 19.2% (5/26) in the control group (P = 0.06). Among the subgroup of patients with neutropenia at the onset of infection, the response rate in the sinus surgery group was significantly better than in the non-surgery group (57% vs. 11.8%; P = 0.028). Similar results were reported by Chen et al. [44] in 2011, who found that surgical debridement was an independent good prognostic factor (P = 0.047) in multivariate analysis in 46 patients with invasive fungal sinusitis. In the discussions section

of that study, aggressive surgical debridement was recommended despite the poor immune status of the host and the bleeding tendencies of many patients with this infection. Eliashar and colleagues reported optimal outcome in 2007, when they analysed 14 patients with invasive Aspergillus sinusitis. All 14 patients received Selleck Roxadustat surgery; however, seven patients needed two or more surgical interventions. In all 14 cases, eradication of invasive Aspergillus sinusitis was achieved. However, none of these cases presented with an intraorbital or an intracranial extension, so no excessive surgery from an open external

approach was necessary, thanks to the early diagnosis of the Aspergillus sinusitis. Suslu et al. [45] reported on 19 patients with acute rhinosinusitis. Early diagnosis and treatment, including aggressive surgical debridement was found essential for recovery in that study. Surgical interventions are also of paramount importance for establishing a microbiologic and histologic diagnosis.[41-44] This demonstrates that surgery is a key factor in the treatment of this disease, however, early diagnosis to allow prompt surgery is necessary.[41, 42, 46] Resection of devitalised tissue, stabilisation of bones that are at risk of fracture, as well as prevention and Selleck ZD1839 treatment of neurological complications due to compression are indicated in Aspergillus osteomyelitis. Surgical intervention can also help to increase penetration of antifungal agents into the bone (in case of failure of conservative therapy).[47-52] Vertebral aspergillosis can lead to catastrophic destruction of the spine, resulting in destabilisation and kyphosis, requiring surgical fusion and/or fixation of vertebrae. In the thoracic spine, the osteomyelitis is mostly caused by haematogenous spread from a pulmonic focus of Aspergillus infection.