The other serum samples were taken at time 0 of Trt (M0), then 1 (M+1), 2 (M+2), 3 (M+3), 6 (M+6) and 12 (M+12) months after the start of Trt, and 6 months after termination of Trt (6M stop Trt). The mean OD values for both groups of patients (NR and CR) were represented on the Fig. 5A for the samples M-1,

M0, M+1, M+2, M+3 and M+6 from at least five patients in each group. Indeed, the Alvelestat manufacturer antiviral therapy was often stopped after 6 months of Trt in the NR group. No significant positive results were observed in the NR group. In contrast, the anti-E1E2A,B response was found significantly (P < 0.05) positive for all serum samples in the CR group compared to the NR group. Notably, before the start (M-1) and 3 months after the start of Trt (M+3), the difference was highly significant (***P < 0.001). We observed that the anti-E1E2A,B response fluctuated over time with a peak at 1 month (M1) after starting treatment. Afterwards, the antibody response decreased (M2), but remained positive (CR3) or even rebounded (CR1, CR2) at 3-6 months (M3, M6) after the start of Trt (Fig. 5B). ROC curve analysis was conducted to assess the cutoffs of anti-E1E2 antibodies at M-1, M+1, M+3 and M+6 which best distinguished responder from NR patients (Fig. 5A,B). Table 2 indicates that at 1 month prior therapy initiation, a threshold of 1131 (OD × 1000) best distinguished responders from nonresponders with

a 100% and 86% PPV and NPV, respectively, meaning that all patients above this threshold subsequently responded to therapy whereas 86% of those below this cutoff failed to achieve SVR. Similar cutoffs were obtained at the other time points with similar Venetoclax predictive values (Table 2). Although a unique standard breakpoint could not be determined, we did observe by ROC curve analysis that a significant difference always remained between NR patients and patients achieving a SVR. When the three biotinylated peptides E1, E2A, and E2B were added together on the same solid phase as peptide combination (E1-E2A-E2B,

Fig. 6A), similar results were obtained compared to the format using separate peptides on three separate solid phase (E1+E2A+E2B, Fig. 6A). The samples positive for anti-E1E2A,B (CR+ or C) were always found significantly positive compared to samples negative for anti-E1E2A,B (NR and CR-). On the Farnesyltransferase other hand, when the test was performed by coating directly the peptides on the solid phase without involving the streptavidin-biotin system (Fig. 6B), the serum samples from C group were again positive whereas those from NR group negative. However, in both cases a lower significance was observed : 0.001 < P < 0.01 (**, Fig. 6A) and 0.01 < P < 0.05 (*, Fig. 6B), respectively, instead of P < 0.001 (***). This likely results from steric hindrance in the first case (Fig. 6A) or improper position of peptides in the second case (Fig. 6B) leading to a decreased accessibility of human antibodies to their corresponding composite E1E2A,B D32.10 epitope.