5%) were located in the sigmoid colon. Proficient MMR tumors lacking BRAFV600E or KRAS mutations were frequently located in the sigmoid colon (58.2%), which is typical of the CIN pathway. 1 Sporadic or familial dMMR subtypes showed a predilection for the proximal colon that also included higher rates of hepatic flexure selleck products and transverse colon location compared with pMMR cancers. Tumor subtype was examined in relationship to patient race (ie, white, African American, or Asian). African Americans had the highest representation among the mutated KRAS and pMMR subtype ( Table 1). Asian patients

were most likely to have pMMR tumors lacking mutations in BRAFV600E or KRAS and in contrast to African Americans or whites, were more frequently represented among familial vs sporadic dMMR tumors. Distributions of DFS rates are shown in Kaplan-Meier curves across the 5 tumor subtypes (Figure 1B) and 5-year DFS rates are

provided ( Table 2). The 5-year DFS rates for the 3 pMMR subtypes range from 55.5% (95% CI: 48.0%−62.9%) for BRAFV600E mutant, 61% (95% CI: 57.6%−64.4%) for KRAS mutant, and 70.7% (95% CI: 68.0%−73.3%) for tumors lacking mutations in either gene ( Table 2). DFS was not statistically different for pMMR tumors with mutations learn more in BRAFV600E or in KRAS (Punadjusted = .1486). Compared with the poorer outcome of the BRAFV600E and KRAS mutant subtypes, favorable DFS was observed for pMMR tumors lacking mutations in either gene (vs mutant BRAFV600E: hazard ratio [HR]unadjusted = 0.56; 95% CI: Adenosine 0.44–0.72; vs mutant KRAS: HRunadjusted = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58–0.78; Punadjusted < .0001 for both). In addition, DFS for the pMMR subtype without BRAFV600E or KRAS mutations

did not differ significantly from the sporadic (Punadjusted = .1448) or familial (Punadjusted = .8511) dMMR subtypes ( Table 3). Five-year DFS rates for sporadic and familial dMMR subtypes were 67.3% (95% CI: 60.1%−74.5%) and 72.3% (95% CI: 60.6%−84.1%), respectively, and were not statistically different ( Table 2). Overall, the univariate results were maintained in a multivariable analysis after adjustment for multiple covariates ( Table 3). An earlier study in this clinical trial cohort found that tumor site and N stage significantly altered the relationship between MMR status and DFS.12 Accordingly, we evaluated the prognostic impact of the 5 subtypes stratified by tumor site and N stage. Although the interaction tests did not achieve statistical significance, likely due to limited power (tumor site: Padjusted = .1368; N stage: Padjusted = .1103), we found that results in the overall cohort were maintained in proximal cancers indicated by lack of significant differences in DFS. Among proximal tumors, 5-year DFS rates for patients with pMMR tumors lacking mutations in BRAFV600E and KRAS or for both dMMR subtypes were significantly better than rates for BRAFV600E mutated or KRAS mutated pMMR subtypes ( Table 2 and Table 4).