Group-A and -B facial nerves presented axons with varying degrees of irregular, thin myelination, and many Schwann cells with dense, small nuclei, and inconsistent sizes. In groups D and E, axons had apparently a more unifying shape and regular, thicker myelin sheath than in groups A and B. Perineural space was wider in groups A and B than in groups D and E. Group C had reactive tissue and axonal phenotype of intermediate intensities between those observed XL184 nmr for control groups (A and B) and for the cell therapy groups (D

and E). Nerve sections from groups C (control), D and E have been submitted to immunofluorescence assay with antibodies anti-S100 as a Schwann cell marker and anti-β-galactosidase to label exogenous BMSC cells or Schwann-like cells derived in vitro from these. All sections have been stained for S100 as an endogenous marker, defining the nerve fascicle limits ( Fig. 4 and Fig. 5). No staining for β-galactosidase has been observed for group C ( Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, B and C). Nerve sections within the grafting Selleckchem RG7420 (proximal segment) and distal to it (distal segment) have been analyzed from groups D and E. Apparently more β-galactosidase-positive cells have been observed in proximal sections ( Fig. 4 E and H) than in distal segments ( Fig. 4 K and N) from group D. In this group,

no double labeling with anti-S100 antibody has been identified ( Fig. 4F, I, L and O). Group E had seemingly fewer cells labeled for β-galactosidase than group D. In addition, group-E proximal segments had nearly half of β-galactosidase-stained cells doubly labeled for S100 ( Fig. 5F, arrowheads), whereas co-labeling in distal segments was less frequent though suggestive in some cells ( Fig. 5G, H and I, arrows). Double labeling refers to the same cell labeled by both antibodies, and not necessarily subcellular colocalization. In the present study, quantitative histological

analyses yielded axonal density for nerve sections within the graft and distal to it. The axonal density comparison disclosed significant reductions in groups A through D in distal sections compared to proximal segments, as seen by the Wilcoxon test, with p-values of 0.028, 0.028, 0.024, and 0.018 respectively for groups A (0.275 vs. 0.214), B (0.269 vs. 0.171), C (0.243 vs. 0.208) and D (0.2 vs. 0.151). No significant difference has been observed for group E (0.216 Succinyl-CoA vs. 0.172, p=0.074) between proximal and distal segments ( Fig. 2B). In addition, for each group, the normal distribution of axonal density within a 95%-confidence interval was compared to group N mean axonal density for either proximal or distal segments. For proximal segments, mean axonal density for group N (0.19) was similar to either group D or E (0.181–0.219 and 0.173–0.260, respectively); and for distal segments, mean axonal density for group N (0.18) was not discordant from groups B or E (0.145–0.197 and 0.134–0.210, respectively). Using the Mann–Whitney test, adjusted by the Bonferroni coefficient (alpha=0.