In this context, it is of great importance to scientifically assess the development level of urban public transport, JAK-STAT Signaling identify the gap between urban public transport development and residents’ actual travel demands, and reduce the “malposition” effect in urban public

transport infrastructure construction and urban development so as to provide a decision-making basis for urban public transport planning, construction, and management in the next step. During the last two decades, there have been a significant volume of studies assessing public transportation development. Been [1] assessed the quality and quantity of public transport

system service. Parkes et al. [2] focused on accessibility. Sheth et al. [3] evaluated bus service level by DEA (data envelopment analysis). Olivková [4] established passenger satisfaction from travel time, regularity and accuracy, time and spatial offer, comfort, costs of freight, and impact on the environment and calculates the average relative importance by passengers who participated in the survey. Vstedal et al. [5] identified 10 key indicators to assess urban public transport accessibility from policy and investment, service operations and standards information, ticketing, vehicles and built environment, and seamless travel. Dodson et al. [6] took multiple indictors into consideration, such as reduction of air pollution, parking congestion mitigation, and reduction of traffic congestion. Mavoaa et al. [7] expanded current public transport accessibility measures by including all components of public transport journey. In china, a lot of studies have been carried out to assess performance in public transport. Due to the specialty of priority development of urban public transport, synthetic assessment system to evaluate

public transport development has yet to be established. Thus, strategic modeling and analysis approaches are needed for evaluating public transport development. In [8, AV-951 9], the hierarchical structure for the assessment of urban public transport development level consisting of 23 indexes was constructed in three aspects, namely, infrastructure level, service level, and benefit level. Tian and Wu [10] discussed that the urban public transport development level was assessed from the network structure, infrastructure level, and service level. Wei-Hua et al. [11] considered that the urban public transport development level was assessed synthetically from analysis of convenience, quickness, safety, efficiency, economy, comfort, and environmental influence.